Immigrants from Mexico vs Chickasaw No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Immigrants from Mexico
Chickasaw
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Immigrants from Mexico
Chickasaw
8.1%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
58th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
43rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Mexico vs Chickasaw No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 510,868,339 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Mexico and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.319 and weighted average of 8.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,505,491 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.334 and weighted average of 7.9%, a difference of 3.5%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Mexico | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 0.44% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 29.4% | 15.9% |
Range | 29.0% | 14.6% |
Mean | 8.1% | 6.1% |
Median | 7.2% | 5.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.3% | 4.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.5% | 7.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.2% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 3.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 3.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Mexico and Chickasaw by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Mexico are Venezuelan (8.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from India (8.2%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (8.1%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Laos (8.2%, a difference of 0.42%), and Celtic (8.1%, a difference of 0.78%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Swiss (7.9%, a difference of 0.080%), French Canadian (7.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Czechoslovakian (7.8%, a difference of 0.36%), Choctaw (7.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and Nonimmigrants (7.9%, a difference of 0.53%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Czechoslovakians | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.8% |
French Canadians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Chickasaw | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Choctaw | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Spanish | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Northern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Afghans | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Hawaiians | 99.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Slovenes | 99.9 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 99.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Celtics | 99.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Venezuelans | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | India | 99.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Laos | 99.8 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 8.2% |