Immigrants from Lithuania vs Chickasaw No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Immigrants from Lithuania
Chickasaw
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Immigrants from Lithuania
Chickasaw
9.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
84.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
43rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Chickasaw No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,637,222 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.540 and weighted average of 9.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,505,491 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.334 and weighted average of 7.9%, a difference of 25.0%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Lithuania | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 1.9% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 14.7% | 15.9% |
Range | 12.8% | 14.6% |
Mean | 5.3% | 6.1% |
Median | 4.4% | 5.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.6% | 4.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.8% | 7.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.1% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 3.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.9% | 3.0% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Lithuania by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Marshallese (9.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Estonian (9.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Moldova (9.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Sudanese (9.8%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from South Africa (9.8%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | Oceania | 87.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 9.7% |
Syrians | 87.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 9.7% |
Latvians | 85.1 /100 | #135 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 85.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 84.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 9.8% |
Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 9.8% |
Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Swiss (7.9%, a difference of 0.080%), French Canadian (7.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Czechoslovakian (7.8%, a difference of 0.36%), Choctaw (7.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Fiji (7.8%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Iraqis | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Basques | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Creek | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Czechoslovakians | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.8% |
French Canadians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Chickasaw | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Choctaw | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Spanish | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Northern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Afghans | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 8.0% |