Canadian vs Chickasaw No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Canadian
Chickasaw
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Canadians
Chickasaw
8.3%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
65th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
43rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Canadian vs Chickasaw No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 435,931,333 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Canadians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.780 and weighted average of 8.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,505,491 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.334 and weighted average of 7.9%, a difference of 5.9%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Canadian | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 1.9% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 15.9% |
Range | 98.1% | 14.6% |
Mean | 20.8% | 6.1% |
Median | 7.8% | 5.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.6% | 4.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.3% | 7.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 21.7% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 27.6% | 3.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 27.2% | 3.0% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Canadians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Canadians are Palestinian (8.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Scotland (8.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Iran (8.4%, a difference of 0.52%), Spaniard (8.4%, a difference of 0.57%), and Croatian (8.3%, a difference of 0.75%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | Mexico | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | India | 99.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Laos | 99.8 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Thais | 99.8 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Chinese | 99.8 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Slovaks | 99.8 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Croatians | 99.8 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Canadians | 99.7 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Palestinians | 99.7 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 8.4% |
Spaniards | 99.7 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 8.4% |
Cajuns | 99.6 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 8.4% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 8.4% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 8.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Swiss (7.9%, a difference of 0.080%), French Canadian (7.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Czechoslovakian (7.8%, a difference of 0.36%), Choctaw (7.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Fiji (7.8%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Iraqis | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Basques | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Creek | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Czechoslovakians | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.8% |
French Canadians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Chickasaw | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Choctaw | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Spanish | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Northern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Afghans | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 8.0% |