Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Chilean No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Chilean
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Chileans
10.2%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
65.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
81.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Chilean No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,497,217 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.149 and weighted average of 10.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,325,892 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.070 and weighted average of 9.9%, a difference of 2.9%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Chilean |
Minimum | 0.36% | 1.7% |
Maximum | 46.0% | 18.4% |
Range | 45.6% | 16.7% |
Mean | 9.8% | 7.6% |
Median | 9.1% | 7.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.3% | 4.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.7% | 9.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.4% | 4.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.3% | 3.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa and Chileans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are New Zealander (10.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Indonesia (10.1%, a difference of 0.58%), Spanish American Indian (10.1%, a difference of 0.73%), Australian (10.1%, a difference of 0.79%), and Immigrants from Micronesia (10.1%, a difference of 0.84%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Immigrants from Bahamas (9.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Bahamian (9.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Hungarian (9.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (9.9%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (9.9%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |
Colombians | 73.9 /100 | #150 | Good 10.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 73.8 /100 | #151 | Good 10.0% |
Immigrants | Congo | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 10.1% |
Tlingit-Haida | 72.5 /100 | #153 | Good 10.1% |
Sioux | 72.4 /100 | #154 | Good 10.1% |
Salvadorans | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 10.1% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 70.9 /100 | #156 | Good 10.1% |
Australians | 70.6 /100 | #157 | Good 10.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 70.2 /100 | #158 | Good 10.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 69.3 /100 | #159 | Good 10.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 65.7 /100 | #160 | Good 10.2% |
New Zealanders | 65.1 /100 | #161 | Good 10.2% |