Immigrants from Serbia vs Chilean No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Immigrants from Serbia
Chilean
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Immigrants from Serbia
Chileans
11.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
1.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
252nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
81.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Serbia vs Chilean No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,395,325 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Serbia and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.449 and weighted average of 11.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,325,892 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.070 and weighted average of 9.9%, a difference of 20.2%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Serbia | Chilean |
Minimum | 0.71% | 1.7% |
Maximum | 19.7% | 18.4% |
Range | 19.0% | 16.7% |
Mean | 7.2% | 7.6% |
Median | 5.9% | 7.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.9% | 4.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.2% | 9.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 4.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 3.9% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Serbia by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Serbia are Egyptian (11.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Black/African American (11.9%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Uruguay (11.9%, a difference of 0.39%), Paiute (11.8%, a difference of 0.60%), and Honduran (12.0%, a difference of 0.66%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | Honduras | 2.1 /100 | #245 | Tragic 11.8% |
Menominee | 2.0 /100 | #246 | Tragic 11.8% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 2.0 /100 | #247 | Tragic 11.8% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 1.9 /100 | #248 | Tragic 11.8% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.9 /100 | #249 | Tragic 11.8% |
Paiute | 1.8 /100 | #250 | Tragic 11.8% |
Blacks/African Americans | 1.6 /100 | #251 | Tragic 11.9% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 1.5 /100 | #252 | Tragic 11.9% |
Egyptians | 1.4 /100 | #253 | Tragic 11.9% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 1.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 11.9% |
Hondurans | 1.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 12.0% |
Liberians | 1.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 12.0% |
Nigerians | 0.9 /100 | #257 | Tragic 12.1% |
South American Indians | 0.9 /100 | #258 | Tragic 12.1% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 0.8 /100 | #259 | Tragic 12.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chileans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Immigrants from Bahamas (9.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Bahamian (9.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Hungarian (9.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (9.9%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (9.9%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | South Africa | 85.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 84.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 9.8% |
Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 9.8% |
Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |
Colombians | 73.9 /100 | #150 | Good 10.0% |