Marshallese vs Chilean No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Marshallese
Chilean
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Marshallese
Chileans
9.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
84.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
81.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Marshallese vs Chilean No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,756,387 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Marshallese and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.486 and weighted average of 9.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,325,892 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.070 and weighted average of 9.9%, a difference of 0.71%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Marshallese | Chilean |
Minimum | 2.7% | 1.7% |
Maximum | 20.0% | 18.4% |
Range | 17.3% | 16.7% |
Mean | 8.6% | 7.6% |
Median | 7.6% | 7.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.3% | 4.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.0% | 9.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.7% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.9% | 4.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 3.9% |
Demographics Similar to Marshallese and Chileans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Marshallese are Immigrants from Lithuania (9.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Estonian (9.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Moldova (9.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Sudanese (9.8%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from South Africa (9.8%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Immigrants from Bahamas (9.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Bahamian (9.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Hungarian (9.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (9.9%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (9.9%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | Azores | 88.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 9.7% |
Kenyans | 88.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 9.7% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 87.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 9.7% |
Syrians | 87.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 9.7% |
Latvians | 85.1 /100 | #135 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 85.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 84.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 9.8% |
Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 9.8% |
Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |
Colombians | 73.9 /100 | #150 | Good 10.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 73.8 /100 | #151 | Good 10.0% |