Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Chilean Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Chilean
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Chileans
34.9%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
1.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
240th/ 347
METRIC RANK
30.7%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
79.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Chilean Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,160,822 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.239 and weighted average of 34.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 245,289,700 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.644 and weighted average of 30.7%, a difference of 13.9%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Chilean |
Minimum | 11.1% | 10.9% |
Maximum | 73.7% | 100.0% |
Range | 62.6% | 89.1% |
Mean | 35.4% | 40.9% |
Median | 35.4% | 32.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 29.5% | 27.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 41.6% | 44.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.1% | 17.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.9% | 23.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.8% | 23.4% |
Similar Demographics by Births to Unmarried Women
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Immigrants from Guyana (35.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Indonesian (35.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Sierra Leonean (34.9%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Cambodia (34.8%, a difference of 0.47%), and Marshallese (34.8%, a difference of 0.53%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Bangladeshis | 2.5 /100 | #233 | Tragic 34.4% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 34.5% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 34.5% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 1.6 /100 | #236 | Tragic 34.7% |
Marshallese | 1.6 /100 | #237 | Tragic 34.8% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 1.6 /100 | #238 | Tragic 34.8% |
Sierra Leoneans | 1.4 /100 | #239 | Tragic 34.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 1.2 /100 | #240 | Tragic 34.9% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 1.2 /100 | #241 | Tragic 35.0% |
Indonesians | 1.2 /100 | #242 | Tragic 35.0% |
Japanese | 0.9 /100 | #243 | Tragic 35.2% |
Guyanese | 0.9 /100 | #244 | Tragic 35.2% |
Shoshone | 0.8 /100 | #245 | Tragic 35.3% |
Nigerians | 0.7 /100 | #246 | Tragic 35.3% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 0.7 /100 | #247 | Tragic 35.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chileans by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Serbian (30.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Somali (30.7%, a difference of 0.19%), Italian (30.8%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Oceania (30.6%, a difference of 0.33%), and Northern European (30.6%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #141 | Excellent 30.5% |
South Africans | 82.7 /100 | #142 | Excellent 30.5% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 82.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 30.5% |
Czechs | 82.1 /100 | #144 | Excellent 30.5% |
Immigrants | North America | 81.5 /100 | #145 | Excellent 30.6% |
Northern Europeans | 81.4 /100 | #146 | Excellent 30.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 81.2 /100 | #147 | Excellent 30.6% |
Chileans | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 30.7% |
Serbians | 78.8 /100 | #149 | Good 30.7% |
Somalis | 77.8 /100 | #150 | Good 30.7% |
Italians | 77.0 /100 | #151 | Good 30.8% |
Poles | 76.2 /100 | #152 | Good 30.8% |
British | 76.0 /100 | #153 | Good 30.8% |
Yugoslavians | 75.1 /100 | #154 | Good 30.8% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 73.9 /100 | #155 | Good 30.9% |