Yakama vs Ute Female Poverty
COMPARE
Yakama
Ute
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Yakama
Ute
18.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
327th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yakama vs Ute Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,917,707 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Yakama and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.792 and weighted average of 18.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,666,863 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.477 and weighted average of 17.5%, a difference of 3.4%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yakama | Ute |
| Minimum | 7.1% | 4.6% |
| Maximum | 52.1% | 73.0% |
| Range | 44.9% | 68.4% |
| Mean | 20.1% | 23.1% |
| Median | 18.4% | 17.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.8% | 15.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.2% | 25.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.5% | 10.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.2% | 14.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.0% | 14.5% |
Demographics Similar to Yakama and Ute by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yakama are Central American Indian (18.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Colville (17.8%, a difference of 1.6%), Immigrants from Honduras (17.7%, a difference of 1.8%), Paiute (17.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and Menominee (17.6%, a difference of 2.6%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Cajun (17.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Dominica (17.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Arapaho (17.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Congo (17.4%, a difference of 0.32%), and Honduran (17.4%, a difference of 0.52%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 19.2% |