Hispanic or Latino vs Ute Female Poverty
COMPARE
Hispanic or Latino
Ute
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Hispanics or Latinos
Ute
16.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
299th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hispanic or Latino vs Ute Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 574,030,648 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Hispanics or Latinos and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.817 and weighted average of 16.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,666,863 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.477 and weighted average of 17.5%, a difference of 4.9%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Hispanic or Latino | Ute |
Minimum | 11.3% | 4.6% |
Maximum | 39.4% | 73.0% |
Range | 28.1% | 68.4% |
Mean | 17.5% | 23.1% |
Median | 16.3% | 17.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.6% | 15.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.8% | 25.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 10.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 14.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 14.5% |
Demographics Similar to Hispanics or Latinos and Ute by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Hispanics or Latinos are Bahamian (16.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Guatemalan (16.7%, a difference of 0.38%), Chippewa (16.7%, a difference of 0.40%), Somali (16.6%, a difference of 0.52%), and Choctaw (16.8%, a difference of 1.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Immigrants from Congo (17.4%, a difference of 0.32%), Honduran (17.4%, a difference of 0.52%), U.S. Virgin Islander (17.3%, a difference of 0.82%), Dutch West Indian (17.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and British West Indian (17.0%, a difference of 2.5%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 16.6% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 16.6% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 16.6% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 16.7% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 16.7% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.9% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.0% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.4% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.4% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.5% |