Yakama vs Houma Female Poverty
COMPARE
Yakama
Houma
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Yakama
Houma
18.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
327th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
334th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yakama vs Houma Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,917,707 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Yakama and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.792 and weighted average of 18.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,796,778 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Houma and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.874 and weighted average of 20.0%, a difference of 11.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yakama | Houma |
| Minimum | 7.1% | 8.5% |
| Maximum | 52.1% | 53.9% |
| Range | 44.9% | 45.4% |
| Mean | 20.1% | 22.3% |
| Median | 18.4% | 19.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.8% | 16.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.2% | 24.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.5% | 7.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.2% | 9.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.0% | 9.7% |
Demographics Similar to Yakama and Houma by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yakama are Central American Indian (18.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Colville (17.8%, a difference of 1.6%), Immigrants from Honduras (17.7%, a difference of 1.8%), Paiute (17.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and Menominee (17.6%, a difference of 2.6%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are Cheyenne (20.2%, a difference of 0.77%), Pueblo (20.7%, a difference of 3.2%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (19.3%, a difference of 3.6%), Yuman (20.8%, a difference of 4.0%), and Apache (19.2%, a difference of 4.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 20.0% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 20.2% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 20.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 20.8% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 20.9% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 21.0% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 21.5% |