Yakama vs Immigrants from Mexico Female Poverty
COMPARE
Yakama
Immigrants from Mexico
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Yakama
Immigrants from Mexico
18.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
327th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
309th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yakama vs Immigrants from Mexico Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,917,707 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Yakama and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.792 and weighted average of 18.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 513,228,632 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Mexico and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.686 and weighted average of 17.0%, a difference of 6.4%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Yakama | Immigrants from Mexico |
Minimum | 7.1% | 6.7% |
Maximum | 52.1% | 100.0% |
Range | 44.9% | 93.3% |
Mean | 20.1% | 27.4% |
Median | 18.4% | 21.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.8% | 16.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.2% | 28.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.5% | 11.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.2% | 19.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.0% | 19.1% |
Demographics Similar to Yakama and Immigrants from Mexico by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yakama are Central American Indian (18.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Colville (17.8%, a difference of 1.6%), Immigrants from Honduras (17.7%, a difference of 1.8%), Paiute (17.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and Menominee (17.6%, a difference of 2.6%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Mexico are Creek (17.0%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Guatemala (17.0%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Somalia (17.0%, a difference of 0.34%), African (16.9%, a difference of 0.39%), and British West Indian (17.0%, a difference of 0.41%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.0% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.4% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.4% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.5% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.5% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 17.5% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 17.5% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 17.6% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 17.7% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.8% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 18.0% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 18.0% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.6% |