Ute vs Iroquois Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Ute
Iroquois
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Ute
Iroquois
28.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
333rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
25.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Iroquois Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,519,789 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.325 and weighted average of 28.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,850,666 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.580 and weighted average of 25.7%, a difference of 10.4%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ute | Iroquois |
Minimum | 18.0% | 11.7% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 82.0% | 88.3% |
Mean | 43.7% | 41.3% |
Median | 37.5% | 32.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 27.4% | 23.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 43.8% | 46.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.3% | 23.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.4% | 25.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.9% | 24.8% |
Demographics Similar to Ute and Iroquois by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Yakama (28.3%, a difference of 0.42%), Native/Alaskan (28.2%, a difference of 0.68%), Pueblo (28.6%, a difference of 0.73%), Hopi (28.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and Menominee (27.8%, a difference of 2.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Cherokee (25.7%, a difference of 0.32%), Ottawa (26.0%, a difference of 1.0%), Chickasaw (26.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and Black/African American (26.4%, a difference of 2.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |