Ute vs Iroquois Single Mother Poverty
COMPARE
Ute
Iroquois
Single Mother Poverty
Single Mother Poverty Comparison
Ute
Iroquois
35.7%
SINGLE MOTHER POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
325th/ 347
METRIC RANK
34.8%
SINGLE MOTHER POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
320th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Iroquois Single Mother Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,474,720 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among single mothers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.002 and weighted average of 35.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 204,844,819 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level among single mothers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.505 and weighted average of 34.8%, a difference of 2.5%.
Single Mother Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ute | Iroquois |
Minimum | 21.7% | 17.9% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 78.3% | 82.1% |
Mean | 53.3% | 56.0% |
Median | 47.4% | 50.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 37.9% | 36.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 66.2% | 78.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 28.3% | 41.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.8% | 26.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.3% | 25.7% |
Demographics Similar to Ute and Iroquois by Single Mother Poverty
In terms of single mother poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Seminole (35.8%, a difference of 0.30%), Ottawa (35.5%, a difference of 0.48%), Kiowa (35.5%, a difference of 0.69%), Black/African American (35.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and Paiute (35.1%, a difference of 1.6%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Chippewa (34.8%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Honduras (34.7%, a difference of 0.39%), Paiute (35.1%, a difference of 0.87%), Cherokee (34.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and Dominican (34.5%, a difference of 1.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Mother Poverty |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 34.3% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 34.4% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 34.4% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 34.5% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 34.5% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 34.5% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 34.7% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 34.8% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 34.8% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 35.1% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 35.2% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 35.5% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 35.5% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 35.7% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 35.8% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 36.4% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 36.4% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 36.6% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 36.6% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 36.7% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 36.8% |