Immigrants from Honduras vs Iroquois Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Honduras
Iroquois
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Honduras
Iroquois
25.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
311th/ 347
METRIC RANK
25.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Honduras vs Iroquois Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 320,392,656 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Honduras and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.405 and weighted average of 25.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,850,666 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.580 and weighted average of 25.7%, a difference of 0.84%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Honduras | Iroquois |
Minimum | 3.6% | 11.7% |
Maximum | 75.2% | 100.0% |
Range | 71.6% | 88.3% |
Mean | 32.7% | 41.3% |
Median | 30.4% | 32.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 24.7% | 23.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 40.2% | 46.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.4% | 23.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.1% | 25.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.0% | 24.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Honduras and Iroquois by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Honduras are Paiute (25.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Comanche (25.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Central American Indian (25.5%, a difference of 0.28%), Dominican (25.4%, a difference of 0.43%), and Aleut (25.4%, a difference of 0.44%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Cherokee (25.7%, a difference of 0.32%), Comanche (25.6%, a difference of 0.68%), Paiute (25.5%, a difference of 0.79%), and Ottawa (26.0%, a difference of 1.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 25.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 25.3% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 25.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 25.3% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 25.4% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 25.4% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 25.4% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 25.5% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |