Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Male Poverty
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Immigrants from Ecuador
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Tsimshian
Immigrants from Ecuador
12.8%
MALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
244th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.9%
MALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
252nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,624,889 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.352 and weighted average of 12.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,825,114 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.195 and weighted average of 12.9%, a difference of 0.94%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Tsimshian | Immigrants from Ecuador |
Minimum | 8.5% | 5.2% |
Maximum | 21.8% | 22.6% |
Range | 13.2% | 17.4% |
Mean | 13.7% | 13.0% |
Median | 13.1% | 12.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.7% | 10.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.3% | 15.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 4.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 4.0% |
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian and Immigrants from Ecuador by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Liberian (12.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Alaskan Athabascan (12.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Nepalese (12.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Sudanese (12.8%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from El Salvador (12.8%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ecuador are Immigrants from Cuba (12.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ghana (12.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (12.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Potawatomi (12.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Sudan (12.9%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Ecuadorians | 0.4 /100 | #238 | Tragic 12.7% |
Ghanaians | 0.4 /100 | #239 | Tragic 12.7% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 12.7% |
Sudanese | 0.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 12.8% |
Nepalese | 0.3 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.8% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.8% |
Tsimshian | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.8% |
Liberians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.8% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.2 /100 | #246 | Tragic 12.8% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.9% |
Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 13.1% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 13.1% |