Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago Male Poverty
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Tsimshian
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago
12.8%
MALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
244th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
257th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,624,889 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.352 and weighted average of 12.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,466,412 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.695 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 1.9%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Tsimshian | Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago |
Minimum | 8.5% | 2.1% |
Maximum | 21.8% | 83.2% |
Range | 13.2% | 81.1% |
Mean | 13.7% | 12.7% |
Median | 13.1% | 11.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.7% | 9.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.3% | 13.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 4.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 8.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 8.4% |
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Liberian (12.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Alaskan Athabascan (12.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Nepalese (12.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Sudanese (12.8%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from El Salvador (12.8%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago are Cape Verdean (13.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (13.0%, a difference of 0.26%), Cherokee (13.1%, a difference of 0.29%), Ottawa (13.1%, a difference of 0.40%), and Immigrants from Liberia (13.0%, a difference of 0.47%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 12.7% |
Sudanese | 0.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 12.8% |
Nepalese | 0.3 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.8% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.8% |
Tsimshian | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.8% |
Liberians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.8% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.2 /100 | #246 | Tragic 12.8% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.9% |
Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 13.1% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 13.1% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 13.1% |
Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 13.1% |