Iroquois vs Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago Male Poverty
COMPARE
Iroquois
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Iroquois
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago
13.2%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
264th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
257th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,214,183 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.608 and weighted average of 13.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,466,412 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.695 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 1.2%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Iroquois | Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago |
Minimum | 3.6% | 2.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 83.2% |
Range | 96.4% | 81.1% |
Mean | 19.1% | 12.7% |
Median | 14.9% | 11.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.5% | 9.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.1% | 13.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 4.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.8% | 8.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.6% | 8.4% |
Demographics Similar to Iroquois and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Jamaican (13.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Guyana (13.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Jamaica (13.3%, a difference of 0.28%), Subsaharan African (13.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and Central American (13.2%, a difference of 0.36%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago are Cape Verdean (13.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (13.0%, a difference of 0.26%), Cherokee (13.1%, a difference of 0.29%), Ottawa (13.1%, a difference of 0.40%), and Trinidadian and Tobagonian (13.1%, a difference of 0.42%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 13.1% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 13.1% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 13.1% |
Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 13.1% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 13.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 13.1% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 13.2% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 13.2% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |
Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 13.3% |