Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Chinese Poverty
COMPARE
Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Chinese
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Trinidadians and Tobagonians
Chinese
14.3%
POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
257th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.5%
POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Chinese Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,718,536 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.382 and weighted average of 14.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,802,428 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.156 and weighted average of 9.5%, a difference of 49.8%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Trinidadian and Tobagonian | Chinese |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 3.4% |
| Maximum | 28.1% | 26.1% |
| Range | 27.1% | 22.7% |
| Mean | 13.0% | 10.2% |
| Median | 12.8% | 9.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.7% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.4% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 5.5% |
Similar Demographics by Poverty
Demographics Similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians are Ottawa (14.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Mexican American Indian (14.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ecuador (14.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from El Salvador (14.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Nicaragua (14.3%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Cree | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 14.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Thai (9.6%, a difference of 0.45%), Immigrants from Taiwan (9.7%, a difference of 1.9%), Immigrants from Ireland (10.1%, a difference of 5.6%), Immigrants from India (9.0%, a difference of 5.6%), and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (10.1%, a difference of 5.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 10.4% |