Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Chinese Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Chinese
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Trinidadians and Tobagonians
Chinese
6.6%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
267th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
1.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
250th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Chinese Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,787,552 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.428 and weighted average of 6.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,795,509 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.402 and weighted average of 6.5%, a difference of 2.2%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Trinidadian and Tobagonian | Chinese |
Minimum | 0.38% | 0.26% |
Maximum | 11.2% | 17.0% |
Range | 10.8% | 16.8% |
Mean | 6.1% | 7.3% |
Median | 6.3% | 6.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 5.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.6% | 8.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.1% | 2.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.1% | 2.7% |
Demographics Similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians and Chinese by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians are Spanish (6.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Guyanese (6.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Bahamian (6.6%, a difference of 0.25%), Nepalese (6.6%, a difference of 0.31%), and Hmong (6.6%, a difference of 0.71%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Native Hawaiian (6.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Hawaiian (6.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Portugal (6.5%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from Bahamas (6.5%, a difference of 0.38%), and Scottish (6.5%, a difference of 0.43%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Portugal | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 6.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 1.1 /100 | #249 | Tragic 6.5% |
Chinese | 1.0 /100 | #250 | Tragic 6.5% |
Hawaiians | 0.9 /100 | #251 | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.8 /100 | #252 | Tragic 6.5% |
Scottish | 0.7 /100 | #253 | Tragic 6.5% |
Belizeans | 0.7 /100 | #254 | Tragic 6.5% |
Welsh | 0.6 /100 | #255 | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 0.6 /100 | #256 | Tragic 6.5% |
Bermudans | 0.5 /100 | #257 | Tragic 6.5% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.5 /100 | #258 | Tragic 6.5% |
Aleuts | 0.4 /100 | #259 | Tragic 6.6% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.4 /100 | #260 | Tragic 6.6% |
Irish | 0.4 /100 | #261 | Tragic 6.6% |
English | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 6.6% |
Hmong | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 6.6% |
Nepalese | 0.2 /100 | #264 | Tragic 6.6% |
Bahamians | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 6.6% |
Guyanese | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 6.6% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 6.6% |
Spanish | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 6.6% |