Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Bangladeshi Poverty
COMPARE
Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Bangladeshi
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Trinidadians and Tobagonians
Bangladeshis
14.3%
POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
257th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.8%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
277th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Bangladeshi Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,718,536 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.382 and weighted average of 14.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,359,209 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.219 and weighted average of 14.8%, a difference of 3.6%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Trinidadian and Tobagonian | Bangladeshi |
Minimum | 1.0% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 28.1% | 30.2% |
Range | 27.1% | 28.9% |
Mean | 13.0% | 14.6% |
Median | 12.8% | 13.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.7% | 11.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.4% | 18.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 6.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 6.2% |
Demographics Similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians and Bangladeshis by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians are Ottawa (14.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (14.3%, a difference of 0.28%), Cape Verdean (14.4%, a difference of 0.36%), Cherokee (14.4%, a difference of 0.38%), and Immigrants from Liberia (14.4%, a difference of 0.54%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bangladeshis are Immigrants from Bahamas (14.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from West Indies (14.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Barbadian (14.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Spanish American (14.7%, a difference of 0.48%), and Chickasaw (14.7%, a difference of 1.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 14.3% |
Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 14.3% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 14.3% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 14.4% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 14.4% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 14.5% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 14.5% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 14.5% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 14.6% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 14.6% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 14.7% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 14.7% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 14.7% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 14.8% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 14.8% |