Immigrants from Ireland vs Chinese Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ireland
Chinese
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Ireland
Chinese
10.1%
POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
5th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.5%
POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ireland vs Chinese Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 240,745,110 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ireland and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.019 and weighted average of 10.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,802,428 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.156 and weighted average of 9.5%, a difference of 5.6%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Ireland | Chinese |
| Minimum | 0.31% | 3.4% |
| Maximum | 22.3% | 26.1% |
| Range | 22.0% | 22.7% |
| Mean | 8.3% | 10.2% |
| Median | 8.1% | 9.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.7% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ireland and Chinese by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ireland are Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (10.1%, a difference of 0.18%), Filipino (10.1%, a difference of 0.32%), Maltese (10.2%, a difference of 0.74%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (10.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and Bulgarian (10.2%, a difference of 1.6%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Thai (9.6%, a difference of 0.45%), Immigrants from Taiwan (9.7%, a difference of 1.9%), Immigrants from India (9.0%, a difference of 5.6%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (10.1%, a difference of 5.8%), and Filipino (10.1%, a difference of 6.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 10.6% |