Swiss vs Immigrants from Saudi Arabia Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Swiss
Immigrants from Saudi Arabia
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Swiss
Immigrants from Saudi Arabia
21.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
24.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
198th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
27.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
196th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Swiss vs Immigrants from Saudi Arabia Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 453,637,180 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.600 and weighted average of 21.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 163,330,182 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.074 and weighted average of 21.3%, a difference of 0.23%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Swiss | Immigrants from Saudi Arabia |
Minimum | 12.5% | 4.9% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 39.7% |
Range | 87.5% | 34.8% |
Mean | 33.2% | 23.3% |
Median | 23.1% | 22.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.2% | 20.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 35.5% | 27.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.3% | 7.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.2% | 8.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 25.0% | 7.8% |
Demographics Similar to Swiss and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Japanese (21.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants (21.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Irish (21.4%, a difference of 0.25%), Nicaraguan (21.3%, a difference of 0.27%), and Czechoslovakian (21.3%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Saudi Arabia are Nicaraguan (21.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Czechoslovakian (21.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Japanese (21.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Basque (21.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Jamaica (21.3%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 36.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 21.2% |
Yugoslavians | 35.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 35.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 21.2% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 35.2 /100 | #190 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Germany | 31.1 /100 | #191 | Fair 21.3% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 30.5 /100 | #192 | Fair 21.3% |
Basques | 28.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 21.3% |
Czechoslovakians | 27.7 /100 | #194 | Fair 21.3% |
Nicaraguans | 27.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 21.3% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 27.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 21.3% |
Japanese | 26.4 /100 | #197 | Fair 21.3% |
Swiss | 24.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 21.4% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 22.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 21.4% |
Irish | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 21.4% |
Nigerians | 20.9 /100 | #201 | Fair 21.4% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 20.7 /100 | #202 | Fair 21.4% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 18.8 /100 | #203 | Poor 21.5% |
Immigrants | Africa | 16.7 /100 | #204 | Poor 21.5% |
Finns | 16.2 /100 | #205 | Poor 21.5% |
Belgians | 16.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 21.5% |
Ghanaians | 15.7 /100 | #207 | Poor 21.6% |