Swiss vs Ecuadorian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Swiss
Ecuadorian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Swiss
Ecuadorians
21.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
24.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
198th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
12.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
215th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Swiss vs Ecuadorian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 453,637,180 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.600 and weighted average of 21.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 313,951,403 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.450 and weighted average of 21.6%, a difference of 1.3%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Swiss | Ecuadorian |
| Minimum | 12.5% | 5.9% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 63.8% |
| Range | 87.5% | 57.9% |
| Mean | 33.2% | 23.1% |
| Median | 23.1% | 20.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.2% | 17.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 35.5% | 24.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.3% | 6.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.2% | 10.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 25.0% | 10.8% |
Demographics Similar to Swiss and Ecuadorians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Japanese (21.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants (21.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (21.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Irish (21.4%, a difference of 0.25%), and Nigerian (21.4%, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Immigrants from Barbados (21.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (21.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Guamanian/Chamorro (21.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Jamaican (21.6%, a difference of 0.22%), and Icelander (21.6%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 27.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 21.3% |
| Japanese | 26.4 /100 | #197 | Fair 21.3% |
| Swiss | 24.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 21.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 22.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 21.4% |
| Irish | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 21.4% |
| Nigerians | 20.9 /100 | #201 | Fair 21.4% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 20.7 /100 | #202 | Fair 21.4% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 18.8 /100 | #203 | Poor 21.5% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 16.7 /100 | #204 | Poor 21.5% |
| Finns | 16.2 /100 | #205 | Poor 21.5% |
| Belgians | 16.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 21.5% |
| Ghanaians | 15.7 /100 | #207 | Poor 21.6% |
| Haitians | 15.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 21.6% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 15.1 /100 | #209 | Poor 21.6% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 14.4 /100 | #210 | Poor 21.6% |
| Icelanders | 14.0 /100 | #211 | Poor 21.6% |
| Jamaicans | 14.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 21.6% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 13.7 /100 | #213 | Poor 21.6% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 13.3 /100 | #214 | Poor 21.6% |
| Ecuadorians | 12.3 /100 | #215 | Poor 21.6% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 12.2 /100 | #216 | Poor 21.7% |