Hawaiian vs Immigrants from Saudi Arabia Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Hawaiian
Immigrants from Saudi Arabia
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Hawaiians
Immigrants from Saudi Arabia
21.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
37.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
186th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
27.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
196th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hawaiian vs Immigrants from Saudi Arabia Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 324,430,861 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.367 and weighted average of 21.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 163,330,182 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.074 and weighted average of 21.3%, a difference of 0.75%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Hawaiian | Immigrants from Saudi Arabia |
Minimum | 4.5% | 4.9% |
Maximum | 45.0% | 39.7% |
Range | 40.5% | 34.8% |
Mean | 23.0% | 23.3% |
Median | 20.9% | 22.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.7% | 20.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.3% | 27.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.5% | 7.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.3% | 8.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.2% | 7.8% |
Demographics Similar to Hawaiians and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Hawaiians are Immigrants from Cambodia (21.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Nigeria (21.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Hungarian (21.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Slovak (21.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and Yugoslavian (21.2%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Saudi Arabia are Nicaraguan (21.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Czechoslovakian (21.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Japanese (21.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Basque (21.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and Swiss (21.4%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Europeans | 42.3 /100 | #181 | Average 21.1% |
Slavs | 40.5 /100 | #182 | Average 21.1% |
Slovaks | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 21.1% |
Hungarians | 39.6 /100 | #184 | Fair 21.1% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 38.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 21.2% |
Hawaiians | 37.7 /100 | #186 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 36.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 21.2% |
Yugoslavians | 35.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 35.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 21.2% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 35.2 /100 | #190 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Germany | 31.1 /100 | #191 | Fair 21.3% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 30.5 /100 | #192 | Fair 21.3% |
Basques | 28.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 21.3% |
Czechoslovakians | 27.7 /100 | #194 | Fair 21.3% |
Nicaraguans | 27.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 21.3% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 27.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 21.3% |
Japanese | 26.4 /100 | #197 | Fair 21.3% |
Swiss | 24.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 21.4% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 22.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 21.4% |
Irish | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 21.4% |
Nigerians | 20.9 /100 | #201 | Fair 21.4% |