Swiss vs Japanese Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Swiss
Japanese
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Swiss
Japanese
21.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
24.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
198th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
26.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
197th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Swiss vs Japanese Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 453,637,180 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.600 and weighted average of 21.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 247,508,626 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.662 and weighted average of 21.3%, a difference of 0.17%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Swiss | Japanese |
| Minimum | 12.5% | 11.5% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 87.5% | 88.5% |
| Mean | 33.2% | 28.5% |
| Median | 23.1% | 23.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.2% | 19.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 35.5% | 32.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.3% | 12.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.2% | 15.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 25.0% | 15.7% |
Demographics Similar to Swiss and Japanese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Immigrants (21.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (21.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Irish (21.4%, a difference of 0.25%), Nicaraguan (21.3%, a difference of 0.27%), and Czechoslovakian (21.3%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (21.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Nicaraguan (21.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Czechoslovakian (21.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Basque (21.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Jamaica (21.3%, a difference of 0.31%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 36.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 21.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 35.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 21.2% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 35.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 21.2% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 35.2 /100 | #190 | Fair 21.2% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 31.1 /100 | #191 | Fair 21.3% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 30.5 /100 | #192 | Fair 21.3% |
| Basques | 28.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 21.3% |
| Czechoslovakians | 27.7 /100 | #194 | Fair 21.3% |
| Nicaraguans | 27.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 21.3% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 27.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 21.3% |
| Japanese | 26.4 /100 | #197 | Fair 21.3% |
| Swiss | 24.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 21.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 22.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 21.4% |
| Irish | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 21.4% |
| Nigerians | 20.9 /100 | #201 | Fair 21.4% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 20.7 /100 | #202 | Fair 21.4% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 18.8 /100 | #203 | Poor 21.5% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 16.7 /100 | #204 | Poor 21.5% |
| Finns | 16.2 /100 | #205 | Poor 21.5% |
| Belgians | 16.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 21.5% |
| Ghanaians | 15.7 /100 | #207 | Poor 21.6% |