Swiss vs European Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Swiss
European
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Swiss
Europeans
14.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
97.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
85th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
98.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
70th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Swiss vs European Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 452,044,614 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.273 and weighted average of 14.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 541,040,111 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Europeans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.754 and weighted average of 14.6%, a difference of 1.3%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Swiss | European |
Minimum | 4.8% | 2.4% |
Maximum | 52.5% | 100.0% |
Range | 47.7% | 97.6% |
Mean | 16.6% | 29.9% |
Median | 14.3% | 17.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.1% | 11.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.5% | 36.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 24.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.4% | 27.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.3% | 27.1% |
Demographics Similar to Swiss and Europeans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Australian (14.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Finnish (14.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Soviet Union (14.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Italy (14.8%, a difference of 0.19%), and Macedonian (14.7%, a difference of 0.44%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Europeans are Slovene (14.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Netherlands (14.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Poland (14.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Austria (14.6%, a difference of 0.16%), and Taiwanese (14.6%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Laotians | 98.4 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 98.3 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Poland | 98.2 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Europeans | 98.1 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Slovenes | 98.1 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 98.1 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.0 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Taiwanese | 98.0 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 98.0 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Russia | 97.9 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 97.9 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Argentineans | 97.9 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 97.9 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Egyptians | 97.9 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Ukrainians | 97.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Macedonians | 97.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Soviet Union | 97.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Swiss | 97.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Australians | 97.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Finns | 97.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 14.8% |