Luxembourger vs European Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Luxembourger
European
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Luxembourgers
Europeans
14.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
53rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
98.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
70th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Luxembourger vs European Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 142,903,603 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.078 and weighted average of 14.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 541,040,111 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Europeans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.754 and weighted average of 14.6%, a difference of 2.2%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Luxembourger | European |
Minimum | 1.4% | 2.4% |
Maximum | 33.3% | 100.0% |
Range | 32.0% | 97.6% |
Mean | 11.9% | 29.9% |
Median | 11.6% | 17.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.9% | 11.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.2% | 36.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.3% | 24.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 27.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 27.1% |
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers and Europeans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Italian (14.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Pakistan (14.2%, a difference of 0.21%), Estonian (14.3%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Romania (14.3%, a difference of 0.47%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (14.4%, a difference of 0.54%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Europeans are Slovene (14.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Poland (14.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Argentina (14.6%, a difference of 0.28%), Laotian (14.5%, a difference of 0.43%), and Immigrants from Belgium (14.5%, a difference of 0.83%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.1 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Italians | 99.1 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Luxembourgers | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Estonians | 98.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 98.9 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Zimbabweans | 98.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Poles | 98.7 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Cambodians | 98.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Scandinavians | 98.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Europe | 98.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.6 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 98.6 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 98.5 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Laotians | 98.4 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 98.3 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Poland | 98.2 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Europeans | 98.1 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Slovenes | 98.1 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 14.6% |