Swiss vs Romanian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Swiss
Romanian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Swiss
Romanians
14.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
97.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
85th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.0%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
95.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
104th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Swiss vs Romanian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 452,044,614 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.273 and weighted average of 14.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 369,938,935 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.478 and weighted average of 15.0%, a difference of 1.7%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Swiss | Romanian |
| Minimum | 4.8% | 4.0% |
| Maximum | 52.5% | 70.0% |
| Range | 47.7% | 66.0% |
| Mean | 16.6% | 23.0% |
| Median | 14.3% | 16.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.1% | 11.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.5% | 28.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 17.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.4% | 19.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.3% | 19.0% |
Demographics Similar to Swiss and Romanians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Australian (14.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Finnish (14.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Soviet Union (14.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Canada (14.8%, a difference of 0.13%), and Jordanian (14.8%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Romanians are British (15.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Malaysia (15.0%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from South Africa (15.0%, a difference of 0.19%), Paraguayan (15.0%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Egypt (15.0%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Soviet Union | 97.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Swiss | 97.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Australians | 97.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Finns | 97.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 97.1 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Northern Europeans | 97.0 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Austrians | 96.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Immigrants | North America | 96.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 96.3 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Germans | 96.3 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 96.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 96.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Basques | 95.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 95.7 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Paraguayans | 95.7 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.6 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 95.6 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| British | 95.6 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Romanians | 95.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 15.0% |