Swiss vs Argentinean Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Swiss
Argentinean
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Swiss
Argentineans
14.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
97.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
85th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
97.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
78th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Swiss vs Argentinean Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 452,044,614 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.273 and weighted average of 14.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 293,059,037 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Argentineans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.086 and weighted average of 14.7%, a difference of 0.89%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Swiss | Argentinean |
Minimum | 4.8% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 52.5% | 56.7% |
Range | 47.7% | 55.6% |
Mean | 16.6% | 13.3% |
Median | 14.3% | 11.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.1% | 7.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.5% | 15.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 7.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.4% | 9.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.3% | 8.9% |
Demographics Similar to Swiss and Argentineans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Australian (14.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Finnish (14.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Soviet Union (14.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Canada (14.8%, a difference of 0.13%), and Jordanian (14.8%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Argentineans are Tlingit-Haida (14.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Russia (14.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Turkey (14.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Egyptian (14.7%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Eastern Europe (14.6%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Slovenes | 98.1 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 98.1 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.0 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Taiwanese | 98.0 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 98.0 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Russia | 97.9 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 97.9 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Argentineans | 97.9 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 97.9 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Egyptians | 97.9 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Ukrainians | 97.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Macedonians | 97.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Soviet Union | 97.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Swiss | 97.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Australians | 97.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Finns | 97.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Canada | 97.1 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Northern Europeans | 97.0 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 14.8% |