Sri Lankan vs South African Family Poverty
COMPARE
Sri Lankan
South African
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Sri Lankans
South Africans
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
86.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
93.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
116th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sri Lankan vs South African Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 439,246,520 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.362 and weighted average of 8.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,354,069 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.807 and weighted average of 8.2%, a difference of 2.8%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sri Lankan | South African |
| Minimum | 2.3% | 2.1% |
| Maximum | 45.5% | 30.8% |
| Range | 43.2% | 28.7% |
| Mean | 10.8% | 7.0% |
| Median | 8.6% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.9% | 8.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 3.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.5% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.4% | 5.6% |
Demographics Similar to Sri Lankans and South Africans by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Chilean (8.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Argentina (8.4%, a difference of 0.50%), Puget Sound Salish (8.4%, a difference of 0.65%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (8.4%, a difference of 0.66%), and Portuguese (8.4%, a difference of 0.84%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Immigrants from Israel (8.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Russia (8.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Western Europe (8.2%, a difference of 0.26%), French (8.3%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (8.2%, a difference of 0.41%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 94.0 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 93.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| South Africans | 93.4 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 93.2 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 92.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| French | 92.8 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 91.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Native Hawaiians | 91.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Paraguayans | 91.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Palestinians | 91.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Soviet Union | 90.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Pakistanis | 90.8 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Icelanders | 90.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 89.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Argentineans | 89.6 /100 | #128 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Portuguese | 89.2 /100 | #129 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 88.6 /100 | #130 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 88.6 /100 | #131 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 88.2 /100 | #132 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Sri Lankans | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Chileans | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 8.5% |