South American Indian vs Uruguayan Male Poverty
COMPARE
South American Indian
Uruguayan
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
South American Indians
Uruguayans
11.5%
MALE POVERTY
22.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
191st/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.2%
MALE POVERTY
51.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
171st/ 347
METRIC RANK
South American Indian vs Uruguayan Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,512,423 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.141 and weighted average of 11.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,748,239 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.181 and weighted average of 11.2%, a difference of 3.1%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | South American Indian | Uruguayan |
Minimum | 2.4% | 0.34% |
Maximum | 38.9% | 25.8% |
Range | 36.5% | 25.4% |
Mean | 12.8% | 8.7% |
Median | 10.3% | 9.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.1% | 3.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.7% | 11.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.6% | 7.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.9% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.8% | 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to South American Indians and Uruguayans by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Israeli (11.5%, a difference of 0.43%), Hawaiian (11.4%, a difference of 0.70%), Sierra Leonean (11.4%, a difference of 0.88%), Immigrants from Iraq (11.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and Immigrants from Sierra Leone (11.4%, a difference of 1.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Uruguayans are Immigrants from Ethiopia (11.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Pennsylvania German (11.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Oceania (11.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Celtic (11.2%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Fiji (11.2%, a difference of 0.49%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Uruguayans | 51.0 /100 | #171 | Average 11.2% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 50.7 /100 | #172 | Average 11.2% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 50.5 /100 | #173 | Average 11.2% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 11.2% |
Celtics | 47.5 /100 | #175 | Average 11.2% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 46.0 /100 | #176 | Average 11.2% |
Lebanese | 45.6 /100 | #177 | Average 11.2% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 44.5 /100 | #178 | Average 11.2% |
Immigrants | Syria | 40.3 /100 | #179 | Average 11.3% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 40.1 /100 | #180 | Average 11.3% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 39.5 /100 | #181 | Fair 11.3% |
Mongolians | 39.0 /100 | #182 | Fair 11.3% |
Kenyans | 38.4 /100 | #183 | Fair 11.3% |
Immigrants | South America | 36.9 /100 | #184 | Fair 11.3% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 33.3 /100 | #185 | Fair 11.4% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 32.9 /100 | #186 | Fair 11.4% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 31.9 /100 | #187 | Fair 11.4% |
Sierra Leoneans | 29.9 /100 | #188 | Fair 11.4% |
Hawaiians | 28.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 11.4% |
Israelis | 26.1 /100 | #190 | Fair 11.5% |
South American Indians | 22.8 /100 | #191 | Fair 11.5% |