Slavic vs Soviet Union Family Poverty
COMPARE
Slavic
Soviet Union
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Slavs
Soviet Union
8.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
95.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
104th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.3%
FAMILY POVERTY
90.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Slavic vs Soviet Union Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,374,378 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.748 and weighted average of 8.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,439,449 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.163 and weighted average of 8.3%, a difference of 2.9%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Slavic | Soviet Union |
| Minimum | 2.2% | 0.36% |
| Maximum | 33.0% | 18.3% |
| Range | 30.8% | 18.0% |
| Mean | 9.1% | 6.5% |
| Median | 7.3% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.7% | 7.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 4.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 3.7% |
Demographics Similar to Slavs and Soviet Union by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Laotian (8.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Egyptian (8.1%, a difference of 0.44%), French Canadian (8.1%, a difference of 0.48%), Basque (8.1%, a difference of 0.57%), and Jordanian (8.2%, a difference of 0.66%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Palestinian (8.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Paraguayan (8.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Native Hawaiian (8.3%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Egypt (8.3%, a difference of 0.35%), and French (8.3%, a difference of 0.92%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Slavs | 95.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Laotians | 95.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Egyptians | 95.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| French Canadians | 95.0 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Basques | 94.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Jordanians | 94.8 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Romanians | 94.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Taiwanese | 94.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Immigrants | France | 94.4 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Canadians | 94.2 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 94.0 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 93.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| South Africans | 93.4 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 93.2 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 92.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| French | 92.8 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 91.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Native Hawaiians | 91.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Paraguayans | 91.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Palestinians | 91.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Soviet Union | 90.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 8.3% |