Slavic vs Immigrants from England Family Poverty
COMPARE
Slavic
Immigrants from England
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Slavs
Immigrants from England
8.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
95.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
104th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
97.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
90th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Slavic vs Immigrants from England Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,374,378 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.748 and weighted average of 8.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 390,846,172 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from England and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.507 and weighted average of 8.0%, a difference of 1.6%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Slavic | Immigrants from England |
| Minimum | 2.2% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 33.0% | 44.4% |
| Range | 30.8% | 42.8% |
| Mean | 9.1% | 11.1% |
| Median | 7.3% | 9.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.7% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 6.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 9.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 8.9% |
Demographics Similar to Slavs and Immigrants from England by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Immigrants from Eastern Europe (8.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Laotian (8.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Indonesia (8.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Norway (8.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and New Zealander (8.1%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from England are Immigrants from Denmark (8.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Serbian (8.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Italy (8.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Belgian (8.0%, a difference of 0.21%), and Czechoslovakian (8.0%, a difference of 0.40%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Belgians | 97.3 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | England | 97.1 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Czechoslovakians | 96.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 96.7 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 96.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 96.5 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 96.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 96.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Welsh | 95.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| New Zealanders | 95.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 95.7 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.7 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 95.6 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Slavs | 95.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Laotians | 95.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Egyptians | 95.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| French Canadians | 95.0 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 8.1% |