Puget Sound Salish vs Soviet Union Family Poverty
COMPARE
Puget Sound Salish
Soviet Union
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Puget Sound Salish
Soviet Union
8.4%
FAMILY POVERTY
88.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
131st/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.3%
FAMILY POVERTY
90.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Puget Sound Salish vs Soviet Union Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,127,030 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.612 and weighted average of 8.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,439,449 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.163 and weighted average of 8.3%, a difference of 0.86%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Puget Sound Salish | Soviet Union |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 0.36% |
| Maximum | 25.9% | 18.3% |
| Range | 23.9% | 18.0% |
| Mean | 9.1% | 6.5% |
| Median | 7.6% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.7% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.9% | 7.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.3% | 4.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.8% | 3.7% |
Demographics Similar to Puget Sound Salish and Soviet Union by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Puget Sound Salish are Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (8.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Argentina (8.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Portuguese (8.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Argentinean (8.4%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Hungary (8.4%, a difference of 0.49%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Pakistani (8.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Palestinian (8.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Paraguayan (8.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Native Hawaiian (8.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and Icelander (8.3%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Russia | 93.2 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 92.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| French | 92.8 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 91.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Native Hawaiians | 91.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Paraguayans | 91.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Palestinians | 91.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Soviet Union | 90.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Pakistanis | 90.8 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Icelanders | 90.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 89.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Argentineans | 89.6 /100 | #128 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Portuguese | 89.2 /100 | #129 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 88.6 /100 | #130 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 88.6 /100 | #131 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 88.2 /100 | #132 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Sri Lankans | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Chileans | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 86.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 86.3 /100 | #136 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 86.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 8.5% |