Immigrants from Southern Europe vs Soviet Union Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Southern Europe
Soviet Union
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Southern Europe
Soviet Union
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
86.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
137th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.3%
FAMILY POVERTY
90.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Southern Europe vs Soviet Union Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 401,468,990 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Southern Europe and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.628 and weighted average of 8.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,439,449 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.163 and weighted average of 8.3%, a difference of 1.7%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Southern Europe | Soviet Union |
Minimum | 4.4% | 0.36% |
Maximum | 20.5% | 18.3% |
Range | 16.1% | 18.0% |
Mean | 10.2% | 6.5% |
Median | 8.8% | 6.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.8% | 3.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.5% | 7.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.7% | 4.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 3.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Southern Europe and Soviet Union by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Southern Europe are Immigrants from Brazil (8.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Malaysia (8.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Chilean (8.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Sri Lankan (8.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and Armenian (8.5%, a difference of 0.40%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Pakistani (8.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Palestinian (8.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Paraguayan (8.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Native Hawaiian (8.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and Icelander (8.3%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Egypt | 91.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Native Hawaiians | 91.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Paraguayans | 91.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Palestinians | 91.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Soviet Union | 90.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Pakistanis | 90.8 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Icelanders | 90.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 89.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 8.4% |
Argentineans | 89.6 /100 | #128 | Excellent 8.4% |
Portuguese | 89.2 /100 | #129 | Excellent 8.4% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 88.6 /100 | #130 | Excellent 8.4% |
Puget Sound Salish | 88.6 /100 | #131 | Excellent 8.4% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 88.2 /100 | #132 | Excellent 8.4% |
Sri Lankans | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 8.5% |
Chileans | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 86.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 86.3 /100 | #136 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 86.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 8.5% |
Armenians | 84.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 84.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 84.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 8.5% |