Romanian vs Native Hawaiian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Romanian
Native Hawaiian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Romanians
Native Hawaiians
19.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
98.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
94th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
96.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
108th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Romanian vs Native Hawaiian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 371,309,640 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.155 and weighted average of 19.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 328,771,814 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.099 and weighted average of 19.9%, a difference of 1.5%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Romanian | Native Hawaiian |
Minimum | 2.5% | 2.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 61.4% |
Range | 97.5% | 59.3% |
Mean | 28.0% | 22.5% |
Median | 19.5% | 20.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.6% | 12.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.1% | 30.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.5% | 18.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 24.2% | 12.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.7% | 12.8% |
Demographics Similar to Romanians and Native Hawaiians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Romanians are Immigrants from Austria (19.6%, a difference of 0.22%), Italian (19.6%, a difference of 0.23%), Soviet Union (19.6%, a difference of 0.28%), Estonian (19.7%, a difference of 0.38%), and Immigrants from Brazil (19.7%, a difference of 0.43%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Native Hawaiians are Colombian (19.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Western Asia (19.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Syria (19.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Ethiopian (19.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and Israeli (19.9%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Soviet Union | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Italians | 98.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.8 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Romanians | 98.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Estonians | 98.2 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 19.7% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 98.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 19.7% |
Croatians | 98.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 19.7% |
Immigrants | France | 97.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 19.7% |
Sierra Leoneans | 97.9 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 19.7% |
Ukrainians | 97.6 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 19.8% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 97.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 19.8% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 97.3 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 19.8% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 97.1 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Chileans | 96.9 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Israelis | 96.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Ethiopians | 96.7 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Immigrants | Syria | 96.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Native Hawaiians | 96.6 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Colombians | 96.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 96.5 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 96.1 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 20.0% |