Immigrants from Chile vs Native Hawaiian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Chile
Native Hawaiian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Chile
Native Hawaiians
20.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
94.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
96.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
108th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Chile vs Native Hawaiian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,927,645 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.452 and weighted average of 20.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 328,771,814 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.099 and weighted average of 19.9%, a difference of 0.86%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Chile | Native Hawaiian |
Minimum | 1.8% | 2.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 61.4% |
Range | 98.2% | 59.3% |
Mean | 25.7% | 22.5% |
Median | 19.7% | 20.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.7% | 12.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.8% | 30.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.1% | 18.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.5% | 12.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.9% | 12.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Chile and Native Hawaiians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Brazilian (20.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South Africa (20.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from South America (20.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Switzerland (20.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and South American (20.0%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Native Hawaiians are Colombian (19.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Western Asia (19.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Syria (19.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Ethiopian (19.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and Carpatho Rusyn (20.0%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Ethiopians | 96.7 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Immigrants | Syria | 96.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Native Hawaiians | 96.6 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Colombians | 96.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 96.5 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 96.1 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 96.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 95.9 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 95.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 95.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Poles | 95.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 95.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 20.0% |
South Americans | 95.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | South America | 95.0 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Brazilians | 94.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Immigrants | Chile | 94.3 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 93.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Serbians | 93.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 20.1% |