Romanian vs Ethiopian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Romanian
Ethiopian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Romanians
Ethiopians
19.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
98.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
94th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
96.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
106th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Romanian vs Ethiopian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 371,309,640 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.155 and weighted average of 19.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,686,273 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.101 and weighted average of 19.9%, a difference of 1.4%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Romanian | Ethiopian |
| Minimum | 2.5% | 4.8% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 33.2% |
| Range | 97.5% | 28.4% |
| Mean | 28.0% | 18.6% |
| Median | 19.5% | 18.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.6% | 15.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.1% | 20.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.5% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 24.2% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.7% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Romanians and Ethiopians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Romanians are Immigrants from Austria (19.6%, a difference of 0.22%), Italian (19.6%, a difference of 0.23%), Soviet Union (19.6%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Lebanon (19.6%, a difference of 0.34%), and Estonian (19.7%, a difference of 0.38%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Immigrants from Syria (19.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Native Hawaiian (19.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Colombian (19.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Western Asia (19.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and Israeli (19.9%, a difference of 0.090%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Soviet Union | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Italians | 98.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.8 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Romanians | 98.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Estonians | 98.2 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 98.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Croatians | 98.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Immigrants | France | 97.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 97.9 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Ukrainians | 97.6 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 19.8% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 97.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 19.8% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 97.3 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 19.8% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 97.1 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Chileans | 96.9 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Israelis | 96.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Ethiopians | 96.7 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 96.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Native Hawaiians | 96.6 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Colombians | 96.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 96.5 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 19.9% |