Romanian vs New Zealander Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Romanian
New Zealander
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Romanians
New Zealanders
19.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
98.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
94th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
53.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
170th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Romanian vs New Zealander Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 371,309,640 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.155 and weighted average of 19.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,229,490 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.505 and weighted average of 21.0%, a difference of 6.9%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Romanian | New Zealander |
| Minimum | 2.5% | 3.9% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 97.5% | 96.1% |
| Mean | 28.0% | 27.1% |
| Median | 19.5% | 21.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.6% | 17.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.1% | 29.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.5% | 12.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 24.2% | 20.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.7% | 19.7% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Romanians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Romanians are Immigrants from Austria (19.6%, a difference of 0.22%), Italian (19.6%, a difference of 0.23%), Soviet Union (19.6%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Lebanon (19.6%, a difference of 0.34%), and Estonian (19.7%, a difference of 0.38%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Zimbabweans | 99.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Afghans | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Soviet Union | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Italians | 98.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.8 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Romanians | 98.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Estonians | 98.2 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 98.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Croatians | 98.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Immigrants | France | 97.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 97.9 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Ukrainians | 97.6 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 19.8% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 97.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 19.8% |
Demographics Similar to New Zealanders by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Moroccan (21.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Guyanese (21.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Guyana (21.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (20.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and Cuban (21.0%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
| Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
| Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
| Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
| New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
| Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
| Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
| Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
| Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
| Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
| Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |