Polish vs Turkish Male Poverty
COMPARE
Polish
Turkish
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Poles
Turks
9.7%
MALE POVERTY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
30th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.0%
MALE POVERTY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Polish vs Turkish Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 558,970,133 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 9.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,656,534 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.037 and weighted average of 10.0%, a difference of 2.6%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Polish | Turkish |
| Minimum | 1.8% | 2.9% |
| Maximum | 46.0% | 20.9% |
| Range | 44.2% | 18.0% |
| Mean | 10.3% | 8.3% |
| Median | 8.8% | 7.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.9% | 8.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.5% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.5% | 3.7% |
Demographics Similar to Poles and Turks by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Tongan (9.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Greek (9.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Korea (9.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Macedonian (9.7%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Northern Europe (9.7%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Serbia (10.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Singapore (10.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Japan (10.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Romania (9.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Moldova (9.9%, a difference of 0.42%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Greeks | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Tongans | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Macedonians | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.5 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Iranians | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Czechs | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.2 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Russians | 99.2 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Cypriots | 99.2 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.1 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 98.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 98.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Turks | 98.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 98.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 98.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 10.0% |