Immigrants from Malaysia vs Bhutanese Single Father Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Malaysia
Bhutanese
Single Father Poverty
Single Father Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Malaysia
Bhutanese
15.2%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
65th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.0%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
50th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Bhutanese Single Father Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,066,405 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.677 and weighted average of 15.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 350,288,163 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.019 and weighted average of 15.0%, a difference of 1.6%.
Single Father Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Malaysia | Bhutanese |
Minimum | 4.4% | 0.92% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 84.3% |
Range | 95.6% | 83.3% |
Mean | 25.0% | 17.6% |
Median | 16.4% | 14.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.2% | 8.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.7% | 21.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.6% | 13.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 24.2% | 14.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.9% | 14.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Malaysia and Bhutanese by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Malaysia are Immigrants from Moldova (15.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Bangladeshi (15.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Paraguayan (15.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Sweden (15.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (15.2%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Pakistan (15.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (15.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from El Salvador (15.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Kenya (15.0%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from China (14.9%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
Immigrants | China | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 99.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 99.9 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 99.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Laos | 99.9 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Laotians | 99.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Hawaiians | 99.9 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 99.9 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Puget Sound Salish | 99.8 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 99.8 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 99.8 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.8 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Bangladeshis | 99.8 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.8 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.8 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Paraguayans | 99.7 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 15.2% |