Paraguayan vs Czechoslovakian Poverty
COMPARE
Paraguayan
Czechoslovakian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Paraguayans
Czechoslovakians
11.4%
POVERTY
94.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
94th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.4%
POVERTY
95.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
89th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Paraguayan vs Czechoslovakian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 95,102,151 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Paraguayans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.047 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,518,810 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.060 and weighted average of 11.4%, a difference of 0.49%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Paraguayan | Czechoslovakian |
Minimum | 1.5% | 0.33% |
Maximum | 21.1% | 27.8% |
Range | 19.6% | 27.5% |
Mean | 9.4% | 12.1% |
Median | 9.4% | 11.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 8.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.2% | 16.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 6.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 6.4% |
Demographics Similar to Paraguayans and Czechoslovakians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Paraguayans are Australian (11.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Romanian (11.4%, a difference of 0.020%), British (11.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from South Africa (11.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Egypt (11.5%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Belgian (11.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Denmark (11.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Jordanian (11.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Northern European (11.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from England (11.4%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Irish | 96.6 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Egyptians | 96.5 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 96.3 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 11.3% |
English | 96.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | England | 96.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Jordanians | 96.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Northern Europeans | 96.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 95.5 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Finns | 95.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 11.4% |
British | 95.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Romanians | 94.9 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Paraguayans | 94.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Australians | 94.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 94.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 94.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 94.5 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Slavs | 93.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.5% |