English vs Czechoslovakian Poverty
COMPARE
English
Czechoslovakian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
English
Czechoslovakians
11.3%
POVERTY
96.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
84th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.4%
POVERTY
95.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
89th/ 347
METRIC RANK
English vs Czechoslovakian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 578,762,394 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of English and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.382 and weighted average of 11.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,518,810 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.060 and weighted average of 11.4%, a difference of 0.36%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | English | Czechoslovakian |
| Minimum | 0.27% | 0.33% |
| Maximum | 69.9% | 27.8% |
| Range | 69.6% | 27.5% |
| Mean | 15.1% | 12.1% |
| Median | 11.3% | 11.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.7% | 8.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.7% | 16.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.0% | 8.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.3% | 6.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.3% | 6.4% |
Demographics Similar to English and Czechoslovakians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to English are Immigrants from Sweden (11.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from England (11.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Jordanian (11.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Egyptian (11.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and Northern European (11.4%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Belgian (11.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Denmark (11.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Jordanian (11.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Northern European (11.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from England (11.4%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | North America | 96.8 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 96.7 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Dutch | 96.7 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Cambodians | 96.7 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Indians (Asian) | 96.6 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Irish | 96.6 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Egyptians | 96.5 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 96.3 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| English | 96.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | England | 96.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Jordanians | 96.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Northern Europeans | 96.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.5 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Finns | 95.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| British | 95.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Romanians | 94.9 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Paraguayans | 94.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Australians | 94.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 94.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 11.5% |