Paraguayan vs Immigrants from South Africa Poverty
COMPARE
Paraguayan
Immigrants from South Africa
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Paraguayans
Immigrants from South Africa
11.4%
POVERTY
94.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
94th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.5%
POVERTY
94.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
96th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Paraguayan vs Immigrants from South Africa Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 95,102,151 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Paraguayans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.047 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,262,094 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.826 and weighted average of 11.5%, a difference of 0.12%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Paraguayan | Immigrants from South Africa |
Minimum | 1.5% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 21.1% | 54.5% |
Range | 19.6% | 53.4% |
Mean | 9.4% | 11.8% |
Median | 9.4% | 9.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 7.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.2% | 13.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 10.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 10.0% |
Demographics Similar to Paraguayans and Immigrants from South Africa by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Paraguayans are Australian (11.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Romanian (11.4%, a difference of 0.020%), British (11.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Egypt (11.5%, a difference of 0.16%), and Finnish (11.4%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Immigrants from Egypt (11.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Latvia (11.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Australian (11.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Romanian (11.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and British (11.4%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | England | 96.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Jordanians | 96.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Northern Europeans | 96.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 95.5 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Finns | 95.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 11.4% |
British | 95.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Romanians | 94.9 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Paraguayans | 94.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Australians | 94.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 94.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 94.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 94.5 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Slavs | 93.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Laotians | 92.4 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Okinawans | 92.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Native Hawaiians | 92.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Portuguese | 92.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 11.6% |