Paraguayan vs Scottish Poverty
COMPARE
Paraguayan
Scottish
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Paraguayans
Scottish
11.4%
POVERTY
94.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
94th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.5%
POVERTY
94.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
100th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Paraguayan vs Scottish Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 95,102,151 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Paraguayans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.047 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 566,309,495 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.670 and weighted average of 11.5%, a difference of 0.43%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Paraguayan | Scottish |
Minimum | 1.5% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 21.1% | 100.0% |
Range | 19.6% | 98.1% |
Mean | 9.4% | 20.9% |
Median | 9.4% | 12.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 9.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.2% | 23.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 14.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 21.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 21.3% |
Demographics Similar to Paraguayans and Scottish by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Paraguayans are Australian (11.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Romanian (11.4%, a difference of 0.020%), British (11.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from South Africa (11.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Egypt (11.5%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Scottish are Immigrants from Indonesia (11.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Latvia (11.5%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Egypt (11.5%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from South Africa (11.5%, a difference of 0.31%), and Slavic (11.5%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Northern Europeans | 96.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 95.5 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Finns | 95.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 11.4% |
British | 95.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Romanians | 94.9 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Paraguayans | 94.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Australians | 94.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 94.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 94.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 94.5 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Slavs | 93.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Laotians | 92.4 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Okinawans | 92.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Native Hawaiians | 92.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Portuguese | 92.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Palestinians | 91.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 11.6% |