Panamanian vs Ghanaian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Panamanian
Ghanaian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Panamanians
Ghanaians
14.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
7.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
209th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
1.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
229th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Panamanian vs Ghanaian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 281,053,413 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Panamanians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.443 and weighted average of 14.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 190,346,829 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.079 and weighted average of 14.7%, a difference of 3.3%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Panamanian | Ghanaian |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 64.6% | 29.2% |
| Range | 62.7% | 27.7% |
| Mean | 14.4% | 13.2% |
| Median | 12.9% | 12.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.2% | 8.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.0% | 15.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.8% | 7.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.8% | 6.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.7% | 6.2% |
Demographics Similar to Panamanians and Ghanaians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Panamanians are Malaysian (14.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Moroccan (14.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Bermudan (14.4%, a difference of 0.80%), Alaskan Athabascan (14.4%, a difference of 0.88%), and Marshallese (14.4%, a difference of 1.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ghanaians are German Russian (14.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Nigeria (14.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Eritrea (14.6%, a difference of 0.52%), American (14.6%, a difference of 0.85%), and Immigrants from Micronesia (14.6%, a difference of 0.85%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Japanese | 4.1 /100 | #219 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Alsatians | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.7 /100 | #221 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.7 /100 | #222 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 3.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Americans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 2.8 /100 | #225 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 2.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 14.7% |
| German Russians | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Ghanaians | 1.9 /100 | #229 | Tragic 14.7% |