Malaysian vs Ghanaian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Malaysian
Ghanaian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Malaysians
Ghanaians
14.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
7.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
210th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
1.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
229th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Malaysian vs Ghanaian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,983,571 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Malaysians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.162 and weighted average of 14.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 190,346,829 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.079 and weighted average of 14.7%, a difference of 3.2%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Malaysian | Ghanaian |
Minimum | 1.5% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 38.2% | 29.2% |
Range | 36.7% | 27.7% |
Mean | 15.2% | 13.2% |
Median | 14.8% | 12.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.0% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.7% | 15.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.6% | 7.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.8% | 6.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.7% | 6.2% |
Demographics Similar to Malaysians and Ghanaians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Malaysians are Panamanian (14.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Moroccan (14.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Bermudan (14.4%, a difference of 0.72%), Alaskan Athabascan (14.4%, a difference of 0.80%), and Marshallese (14.4%, a difference of 0.96%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ghanaians are German Russian (14.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Nigeria (14.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Eritrea (14.6%, a difference of 0.52%), American (14.6%, a difference of 0.85%), and Immigrants from Micronesia (14.6%, a difference of 0.85%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 14.2% |
Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 14.3% |
Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |
Japanese | 4.1 /100 | #219 | Tragic 14.5% |
Alsatians | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.7 /100 | #221 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.7 /100 | #222 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Africa | 3.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 14.5% |
Americans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 2.8 /100 | #225 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 2.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 14.7% |
German Russians | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 14.7% |
Ghanaians | 1.9 /100 | #229 | Tragic 14.7% |