Panamanian vs Alaskan Athabascan Female Poverty
COMPARE
Panamanian
Alaskan Athabascan
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Panamanians
Alaskan Athabascans
14.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
7.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
209th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
5.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
213th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Panamanian vs Alaskan Athabascan Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 281,053,413 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Panamanians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.443 and weighted average of 14.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,807,044 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.404 and weighted average of 14.4%, a difference of 0.88%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Panamanian | Alaskan Athabascan |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 0.78% |
| Maximum | 64.6% | 69.0% |
| Range | 62.7% | 68.2% |
| Mean | 14.4% | 21.7% |
| Median | 12.9% | 15.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.2% | 11.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.0% | 28.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.8% | 16.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.8% | 16.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.7% | 16.3% |
Demographics Similar to Panamanians and Alaskan Athabascans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Panamanians are Immigrants from the Azores (14.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Malaysian (14.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Moroccan (14.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (14.2%, a difference of 0.41%), and Bermudan (14.4%, a difference of 0.80%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Bermudan (14.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Marshallese (14.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Panama (14.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Thailand (14.4%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants (14.4%, a difference of 0.42%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 21.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 13.9% |
| Hmong | 21.1 /100 | #202 | Fair 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 20.7 /100 | #203 | Fair 13.9% |
| Spaniards | 18.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 13.9% |
| Ugandans | 15.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 9.0 /100 | #207 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 7.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Japanese | 4.1 /100 | #219 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Alsatians | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.7 /100 | #221 | Tragic 14.5% |