Panamanian vs Zimbabwean Female Poverty
COMPARE
Panamanian
Zimbabwean
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Panamanians
Zimbabweans
14.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
7.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
209th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
97.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
73rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Panamanian vs Zimbabwean Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 281,053,413 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Panamanians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.443 and weighted average of 14.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,185,827 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.277 and weighted average of 12.3%, a difference of 16.3%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Panamanian | Zimbabwean |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 64.6% | 21.7% |
| Range | 62.7% | 19.5% |
| Mean | 14.4% | 10.3% |
| Median | 12.9% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.2% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.0% | 13.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.8% | 7.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.8% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.7% | 5.2% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Panamanians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Panamanians are Immigrants from the Azores (14.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Malaysian (14.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Moroccan (14.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (14.2%, a difference of 0.41%), and Bermudan (14.4%, a difference of 0.80%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Hmong | 21.1 /100 | #202 | Fair 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 20.7 /100 | #203 | Fair 13.9% |
| Spaniards | 18.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 13.9% |
| Ugandans | 15.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 9.0 /100 | #207 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 7.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Canada (12.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Cambodian (12.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Carpatho Rusyn (12.2%, a difference of 0.050%), European (12.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Belgium (12.2%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Austrians | 97.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 97.8 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.8 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Swiss | 97.7 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 97.7 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 97.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Cambodians | 97.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Zimbabweans | 97.5 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 97.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Europeans | 97.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 97.2 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Egyptians | 97.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | North America | 97.1 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Slovaks | 97.1 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 12.3% |