Immigrants from the Azores vs Alaskan Athabascan Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from the Azores
Alaskan Athabascan
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from the Azores
Alaskan Athabascans
14.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
7.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
208th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
5.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
213th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from the Azores vs Alaskan Athabascan Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,244,959 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from the Azores and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.405 and weighted average of 14.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,807,044 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.404 and weighted average of 14.4%, a difference of 0.95%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from the Azores | Alaskan Athabascan |
Minimum | 0.65% | 0.78% |
Maximum | 25.2% | 69.0% |
Range | 24.5% | 68.2% |
Mean | 12.0% | 21.7% |
Median | 11.3% | 15.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.9% | 11.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.8% | 28.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 16.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 16.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.6% | 16.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from the Azores and Alaskan Athabascans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from the Azores are Panamanian (14.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Malaysian (14.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Moroccan (14.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (14.2%, a difference of 0.34%), and Bermudan (14.4%, a difference of 0.86%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Bermudan (14.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Marshallese (14.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Panama (14.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Thailand (14.4%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants (14.4%, a difference of 0.42%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Spanish | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 13.9% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 21.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 13.9% |
Hmong | 21.1 /100 | #202 | Fair 13.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 20.7 /100 | #203 | Fair 13.9% |
Spaniards | 18.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 13.9% |
Ugandans | 15.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 14.0% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 14.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 9.0 /100 | #207 | Tragic 14.2% |
Immigrants | Azores | 7.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 14.2% |
Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 14.2% |
Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 14.3% |
Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |
Japanese | 4.1 /100 | #219 | Tragic 14.5% |
Alsatians | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 14.5% |